The Guild of Mute Assasins

I'm no longer playing

All we're doing is giving a voice to their insane ramblings. Bunch of rednecks.

...and they don't even have Neo-con in their Wiki !

Sorry couldn't resist

http://www.conservapedia.com/Is_gun-con ... ng_guns%3F

That's a very funny satirical site.

It is satire isn't it?

Please tell me it is.

Sorry mate, they're the people who think they and their mind-set should be ruling America.

Why won't they give me an account?

Not only is Ocean not yet done, there's important information about the number of Americans who believe they've been abducted by aliens to enter.

Dunwa wrote:Sorry couldn't resist

http://www.conservapedia.com/Is_gun-con ... ng_guns%3F

Class.

OMG Conservipedia is hilarious and appalling...

A conservative adheres to principles of limited government, personal responsibility and moral virtue. He agrees with the statement in George Washington's Farewell Address that "religion and morality are indispensable supports" to political prosperity.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution - another well written, balanced assessment. Presents both sides pretty well....

Among Christians there has been a special group: the homeschoolers. Though even smaller in number, they have accomplished much for Christ and the world. Now that we have covered all of world history, ask yourself how many of the following homeschooled achievers you can identify:

- yeah, why go to school and listen to all their hogwash. Let's stay home and learn from the bible..

Best section ever...
http://www.conservapedia.com/Should_Cre ... schools%3F

"Creationism is not scientific? This is absolute nonsense. This is what evolutionists like to think, but it is the farthest thing from the truth. What can evolutionists bring up about creationism that is non-scientific?"

followed by the swift and undeniable come back : "Philip, you seem to be implying that creationism is scientific, but provide no information to that effect. I think if you look objectively, you will find that there isn't much in the way of evidence to support creationism besides the Bible"

Woooooo one for science... ps check out science on conservipedia.. its almost as lame an entry as "sea"...

i think it was dunwa, who was upset about not beingt able to subsrcibe and make an entry for ocean... Me too.. we must petition them to sort their foolish ways.

A wee thing i remembered from dave gormans google wacking adventure... so checked it up

http://www.conservapedia.com/Second_Law ... modynamics

behold the twisting of the Second law of thermodynamics

Hold up best article yet....

NOAH'S ARk:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Noah%27s_Ark

so linked off that page to : http://www.reasons.org/resources/apolog ... tion.shtml

many great things there such as grand canyon and all geoligical features and fossils were created by the "great flood".. but then comes the gretaest paragraph ever ....

"One problem for the global-Flood view is explaining how the earth was repopulated with land animals after the Flood. Young-earth creationists who recognize the problem of fitting all the land animals on the ark now conclude Noah only took pairs of the Genesis "kinds." These, they say, were the ancestral seeds God provided to repopulate the world. As the "kinds" left the ark, they gave rise to the many different species on Earth today. For example, horses, zebras and donkeys descended from an equine "kind," dogs, wolves, coyotes and jackals from a canine "kind," and cattle, bison and water buffalos from a cattle "kind."3"


sorry pretty large passage to post... but is it only me or does the expansian of canine, equine class animals to great sub classes not require EVOLUTION ! ! ! ! (but this article is against)

the article used to contradict this comes from http://www.rae.org/noah.html

Every major anti-Creationist argument against the Ark examined and systematically debunked.

http://www.rae.org/noahfaq.html

People actually believe that Noah built a boat to house every species of animal. How nice for them...

KERS4 wrote:A wee thing i remembered from dave gormans google wacking adventure... so checked it up

http://www.conservapedia.com/Second_Law ... modynamics

behold the twisting of the Second law of thermodynamics

That doesn't even make a coherent argument, never mind sense...

DeadElvis wrote:

Every major anti-Creationist argument against the Ark examined and systematically debunked.

http://www.rae.org/noahfaq.html

People actually believe that Noah built a boat to house every species of animal. How nice for them...

Now that is a serious and comprehensive document with clear references and concise arguments.

God loved Noah and his family enough to get them to shovel 16000 animals worth of crap

How would a wooden vessel even be big enough and be controllable by a crew of 8 - of which most are women and children? Madness.

Only 8,000 animal species?

Seems a tad on the low side.

There's 4,000 mammals alone.

6,500 reptiles (though I suppose they could float)

Nearly 9,000 birds

Over a million insects

5,500 amphibians - though they could stay with the fish, I suppose.

Food for this lot for a year.

What about the plants? Gonna get very soggy.

And then, the flood abates, the Ark lands on Mt. Ararat in Turkey.

How does a penguin get from the top of a mountain in Turkey to the Antartic?

Hav wrote:How does a penguin get from the top of a mountain in Turkey to the Antartic?

ROFL

From "Madagascar" - "Well, this sucks."

I have branched out from links on that site to another cracker.

http://www.answersingenesis.org

Oh dear. They have reviews of some films. One review, of 2001, has

"The film opens with a lengthy scene of ape-like creatures (resembling ‘Australopithecines,’ which many evolutionists claim were ‘missing links’–poorly costumed by Hollywood standards)."

2001 lost on the Oscar for Best Makeup Effect to "Planet of the Apes" as the awards comittee believed they'd used real apes in 2001...

It gets better. Or worse. Ah, Finance Work Avoidance Day is here again...

I can't belive you are worrying about the ark and if the animals would fit it !!

I can't get past the first sentance

When Noah was 600 years old, God commanded Noah to build an Ark

:shock: :shock: