All we're doing is giving a voice to their insane ramblings. Bunch of rednecks.
...and they don't even have Neo-con in their Wiki !
Coservipedia
-
Dunwa
- The Taker Of The Holy Tags and Bar
- Posts: 4390
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 7:56 pm
- Location: xǝɹnoɟ
-
Haviland
- Volvo-Driving Soccer Mom
- Posts: 8664
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 9:12 am
- Location: Secret Bar of Evil
-
DeadElvis
- 2nd Lieutenant
- Posts: 1349
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 12:45 pm
- Location: A bee bit my bottom. Now my bottom's big.
Class.
OMG Conservipedia is hilarious and appalling...
http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution - another well written, balanced assessment. Presents both sides pretty well....A conservative adheres to principles of limited government, personal responsibility and moral virtue. He agrees with the statement in George Washington's Farewell Address that "religion and morality are indispensable supports" to political prosperity.
- yeah, why go to school and listen to all their hogwash. Let's stay home and learn from the bible..Among Christians there has been a special group: the homeschoolers. Though even smaller in number, they have accomplished much for Christ and the world. Now that we have covered all of world history, ask yourself how many of the following homeschooled achievers you can identify:
Lisa, if the bible has taught us anything - and it hasn't - it's that girls should stick to girl's sports, such as hot-oil wrestling, foxy boxing and such and such.
-
KERS4
- First Sergeant
- Posts: 927
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 1:46 pm
Best section ever...
http://www.conservapedia.com/Should_Cre ... schools%3F
"Creationism is not scientific? This is absolute nonsense. This is what evolutionists like to think, but it is the farthest thing from the truth. What can evolutionists bring up about creationism that is non-scientific?"
followed by the swift and undeniable come back : "Philip, you seem to be implying that creationism is scientific, but provide no information to that effect. I think if you look objectively, you will find that there isn't much in the way of evidence to support creationism besides the Bible"
Woooooo one for science... ps check out science on conservipedia.. its almost as lame an entry as "sea"...
i think it was dunwa, who was upset about not beingt able to subsrcibe and make an entry for ocean... Me too.. we must petition them to sort their foolish ways.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Should_Cre ... schools%3F
"Creationism is not scientific? This is absolute nonsense. This is what evolutionists like to think, but it is the farthest thing from the truth. What can evolutionists bring up about creationism that is non-scientific?"
followed by the swift and undeniable come back : "Philip, you seem to be implying that creationism is scientific, but provide no information to that effect. I think if you look objectively, you will find that there isn't much in the way of evidence to support creationism besides the Bible"
Woooooo one for science... ps check out science on conservipedia.. its almost as lame an entry as "sea"...
i think it was dunwa, who was upset about not beingt able to subsrcibe and make an entry for ocean... Me too.. we must petition them to sort their foolish ways.
-
KERS4
- First Sergeant
- Posts: 927
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 1:46 pm
A wee thing i remembered from dave gormans google wacking adventure... so checked it up
http://www.conservapedia.com/Second_Law ... modynamics
behold the twisting of the Second law of thermodynamics
http://www.conservapedia.com/Second_Law ... modynamics
behold the twisting of the Second law of thermodynamics
-
KERS4
- First Sergeant
- Posts: 927
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 1:46 pm
Hold up best article yet....
NOAH'S ARk:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Noah%27s_Ark
so linked off that page to : http://www.reasons.org/resources/apolog ... tion.shtml
many great things there such as grand canyon and all geoligical features and fossils were created by the "great flood".. but then comes the gretaest paragraph ever ....
"One problem for the global-Flood view is explaining how the earth was repopulated with land animals after the Flood. Young-earth creationists who recognize the problem of fitting all the land animals on the ark now conclude Noah only took pairs of the Genesis "kinds." These, they say, were the ancestral seeds God provided to repopulate the world. As the "kinds" left the ark, they gave rise to the many different species on Earth today. For example, horses, zebras and donkeys descended from an equine "kind," dogs, wolves, coyotes and jackals from a canine "kind," and cattle, bison and water buffalos from a cattle "kind."3"
sorry pretty large passage to post... but is it only me or does the expansian of canine, equine class animals to great sub classes not require EVOLUTION ! ! ! ! (but this article is against)
the article used to contradict this comes from http://www.rae.org/noah.html
NOAH'S ARk:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Noah%27s_Ark
so linked off that page to : http://www.reasons.org/resources/apolog ... tion.shtml
many great things there such as grand canyon and all geoligical features and fossils were created by the "great flood".. but then comes the gretaest paragraph ever ....
"One problem for the global-Flood view is explaining how the earth was repopulated with land animals after the Flood. Young-earth creationists who recognize the problem of fitting all the land animals on the ark now conclude Noah only took pairs of the Genesis "kinds." These, they say, were the ancestral seeds God provided to repopulate the world. As the "kinds" left the ark, they gave rise to the many different species on Earth today. For example, horses, zebras and donkeys descended from an equine "kind," dogs, wolves, coyotes and jackals from a canine "kind," and cattle, bison and water buffalos from a cattle "kind."3"
sorry pretty large passage to post... but is it only me or does the expansian of canine, equine class animals to great sub classes not require EVOLUTION ! ! ! ! (but this article is against)
the article used to contradict this comes from http://www.rae.org/noah.html
-
DeadElvis
- 2nd Lieutenant
- Posts: 1349
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 12:45 pm
- Location: A bee bit my bottom. Now my bottom's big.
http://www.rae.org/noahfaq.htmlEvery major anti-Creationist argument against the Ark examined and systematically debunked.
People actually believe that Noah built a boat to house every species of animal. How nice for them...
Lisa, if the bible has taught us anything - and it hasn't - it's that girls should stick to girl's sports, such as hot-oil wrestling, foxy boxing and such and such.
-
Haviland
- Volvo-Driving Soccer Mom
- Posts: 8664
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 9:12 am
- Location: Secret Bar of Evil
That doesn't even make a coherent argument, never mind sense...KERS4 wrote:A wee thing i remembered from dave gormans google wacking adventure... so checked it up
http://www.conservapedia.com/Second_Law ... modynamics
behold the twisting of the Second law of thermodynamics
-
Wyvern
- Captain Pugwash
- Posts: 5818
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:54 pm
- Location: At the helm of Thunderchild
Now that is a serious and comprehensive document with clear references and concise arguments.DeadElvis wrote:http://www.rae.org/noahfaq.htmlEvery major anti-Creationist argument against the Ark examined and systematically debunked.
People actually believe that Noah built a boat to house every species of animal. How nice for them...
God loved Noah and his family enough to get them to shovel 16000 animals worth of crap
How would a wooden vessel even be big enough and be controllable by a crew of 8 - of which most are women and children? Madness.
They got things like the atom bamb... so I'm gonna stay where I... AM!
-
Haviland
- Volvo-Driving Soccer Mom
- Posts: 8664
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 9:12 am
- Location: Secret Bar of Evil
Only 8,000 animal species?
Seems a tad on the low side.
There's 4,000 mammals alone.
6,500 reptiles (though I suppose they could float)
Nearly 9,000 birds
Over a million insects
5,500 amphibians - though they could stay with the fish, I suppose.
Food for this lot for a year.
What about the plants? Gonna get very soggy.
And then, the flood abates, the Ark lands on Mt. Ararat in Turkey.
How does a penguin get from the top of a mountain in Turkey to the Antartic?
Seems a tad on the low side.
There's 4,000 mammals alone.
6,500 reptiles (though I suppose they could float)
Nearly 9,000 birds
Over a million insects
5,500 amphibians - though they could stay with the fish, I suppose.
Food for this lot for a year.
What about the plants? Gonna get very soggy.
And then, the flood abates, the Ark lands on Mt. Ararat in Turkey.
How does a penguin get from the top of a mountain in Turkey to the Antartic?
-
Haviland
- Volvo-Driving Soccer Mom
- Posts: 8664
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 9:12 am
- Location: Secret Bar of Evil
From "Madagascar" - "Well, this sucks."
I have branched out from links on that site to another cracker.
http://www.answersingenesis.org
Oh dear. They have reviews of some films. One review, of 2001, has
It gets better. Or worse. Ah, Finance Work Avoidance Day is here again...
I have branched out from links on that site to another cracker.
http://www.answersingenesis.org
Oh dear. They have reviews of some films. One review, of 2001, has
2001 lost on the Oscar for Best Makeup Effect to "Planet of the Apes" as the awards comittee believed they'd used real apes in 2001..."The film opens with a lengthy scene of ape-like creatures (resembling ‘Australopithecines,’ which many evolutionists claim were ‘missing links’–poorly costumed by Hollywood standards)."
It gets better. Or worse. Ah, Finance Work Avoidance Day is here again...
-
Dunwa
- The Taker Of The Holy Tags and Bar
- Posts: 4390
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 7:56 pm
- Location: xǝɹnoɟ